A beacon that provides for the needs of the people.

With the information age one of the byproducts rising to dominance is also the propaganda age. Not like in the cold war between countries, but between governments and individuals, between political movements and groups and agenda’s. 

We are no longer allowed the luxury of assumed truth.  Truth is a luxury like gold, that must be dug up from an earth of slander and misdirection.  From the claim found in the mountainous territory of liquid information.

But one of the benefits of this information age is the ability to seek out the truth. Not just simple relative truth, but absolute truth.  Not on a corporate level but on an individual level of effort.  Which is becoming the right and responsibility hopefully, of the individual.  Truth is still available to the individual if one will search and dig for it with diligence. 

Gone are the days of blind faith and trust. With so many players on the field, accountability is a luxury that accompanied honor, which has been replaced by deception and foolishness.

Honor and accountability? Is a fleeting character of truth looking for the shinning light.  My hope is that Honor and accountability will become that unusual beacon of the light of Truth that everyone is drawn to in times of despair and uncertainty. A beacon that provides for the needs of the people.  That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it.  Gospel of John 1:5 (CSB)

Bill Collier

http://mindworthy.mypodcast.com

July 10, 1997: Neanderthal DNA Suggests a Separate, Unequal Being

This article, what can I say. I am just a bit flabbergasted. Now we are an inferior being? Oh I understand, the Unequal Being is survived by the inferior being. Because of DNA research, obviously they can no longer make claims that something is billions of years old. But now they expect me to swallow that we are cross bread of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals. This article states that, "that theory has been debunked by DNA analysis, but the debate continues." What debate? The discussion is over!

It seems to me by reading this article we are seeing an even bigger story than the subject of this article. In what is being stated is a sense of insecurity as to what the truth really is. The author uses expressions like "but seem to point" and "for approximately 30,000 years" and "was seemingly", and this last one "Fossils indicate". You can make "Fossils indicate" what ever you want to argue.

What I am seeing here, which is the good news about this article is the author's intimidation by the advances in modern science and technology. He is very careful to stay in a safe position for fear of scrutiny.

In my opinion, the shady history of the secular anthropologists and their insane boasts over the last couple of hundred years, and even right into our day, are now, to borrow a expression from this author, "are seemingly" motivated by their want for more money to fund their so called expeditions and experiments. If the anthropologist of a generation ago stuck to what was found to be true and honest, they would have to find another way to financially support themselves and also to expatiate their egos.

Fortunately today with technology increasing in accuracy and proving what is true. We will be able to know that it is a pig's tooth instead of a whole new species found in Nebraska.

Powered by ScribeFire.