This article, what can I say. I am just a bit flabbergasted. Now we are an inferior being? Oh I understand, the Unequal Being is survived by the inferior being. Because of DNA research, obviously they can no longer make claims that something is billions of years old. But now they expect me to swallow that we are cross bread of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals. This article states that, "that theory has been debunked by DNA analysis, but the debate continues." What debate? The discussion is over!
It seems to me by reading this article we are seeing an even bigger story than the subject of this article. In what is being stated is a sense of insecurity as to what the truth really is. The author uses expressions like "but seem to point" and "for approximately 30,000 years" and "was seemingly", and this last one "Fossils indicate". You can make "Fossils indicate" what ever you want to argue.
What I am seeing here, which is the good news about this article is the author's intimidation by the advances in modern science and technology. He is very careful to stay in a safe position for fear of scrutiny.
In my opinion, the shady history of the secular anthropologists and their insane boasts over the last couple of hundred years, and even right into our day, are now, to borrow a expression from this author, "are seemingly" motivated by their want for more money to fund their so called expeditions and experiments. If the anthropologist of a generation ago stuck to what was found to be true and honest, they would have to find another way to financially support themselves and also to expatiate their egos.
Fortunately today with technology increasing in accuracy and proving what is true. We will be able to know that it is a pig's tooth instead of a whole new species found in Nebraska.
Powered by ScribeFire.
